ANSWERS: 14
-
No, I think it gives women a skewed view of the world. I don't read it.
-
Cannot say I read it. most womens magazines i just look at to see what new perfumes or products are on the market, or the fashion pages.
-
No, it's particularly useless to me.
-
No, I think it's pointless and it's readers are generally people I don't associate with. The information it contains is particularly repetitive and useless and seems to be a good guideline for anyone wishing to lead the life of a brainless skank.
-
Absolutely not. It's half-filled with ads and half-filled with fairly useless articels and quizzess. It's 100% a false representation of what young women should look like, feel, how they should live and what they should value.
-
-
BootsiebabyArticels? That would be pronounced "arti-sells". That doesn't sound right, does it? Lol:)
-
-
The constant cleavage in the cover is pretty nice.
-
No, I read Maxim instead. Way better articles.
-
It's Cosmopolitan, not Cosmopilitan. I have read it a few times.
-
12-21-2016 At one time Cosmo was about as good as Playboy for showing skin, but that didn't last. Cosmo is the one pushing all that image crap that feminists whine about. Well, not the only one.
-
There was a "Cosmopolitan" some years ago that was geared toward working women and had a lot about fashion which I was not interested in at the time. And about having more orgasms which I eventually figured out for myself (with the help of a number of wonderful men).
-
No, I don't read it. I saw some years ago, and they didn't appeal to me.
-
yes
-
Some brains thrive in gutter magazines
-
-
Cry me a River
Makes me wonder if the women can feel pretty not all made up
-
-
No, I did not particularly like it. I have seen a few issues at public libraries, but it does not interest me enough to buy it.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC